|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dirt Diggers Digest No. 80
Editor: Philip Mattera
September 27, 2007
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Contents
-- 1. Happy Right to Know Day
-- 2. Pressure mounts for corporate
disclosure of climate risk
-- 3. Shareholder activists mobilize to
oppose restrictions on resolutions
-- 4. Another federal contracts database
unveiled
-- 5. SEC seeks more details on
executive compensation
-- 6. PACER to provide federal court
transcripts
-- 7. Report sees rise in corporate
attention to social responsibility
-- 8. Tracking down cell phone numbers
-- 9. Finding online corporate
information you are not supposed to see
-- 10. WikiScanner exposes conflicts of
interest among Wikipedia editors
-- 11. Job Posting [not included in web
version]
|
1. Happy Right to Know Day
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tomorrow, September 28, is
International Right to Know Day, an event
meant to raise public awareness of the
issue of government transparency. The word
"international" in the name reflects the
fact that access to government information
is a matter of growing concern throughout
the world. Promotion of Right to Know Day
is being led by the
FOI Advocates Network, a coalition
whose funding flows through the Access to
Information Programme in Bulgaria.
|
2. Pressure mounts for corporate
disclosure of climate risk
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Treasurers and other financial
officials from ten states recently joined
with Environmental Defense and CERES in
filing what they called a landmark
petition to the Securities and
Exchange Commission, asking the agency to
require publicly traded companies to
disclose the risks that climate change may
pose to their financial condition. The
coalition, whose members oversee the
management of more than $1.5 trillion in
assets, also
announced that it was asking the SEC's
Division of Corporate Finance to
investigate whether the absence of climate
disclosure represents a violation of
existing law.
The petition follows a request last
March by the members of the
Investor Network on Climate Risk that
the SEC clarify its climate disclosure
requirements. The agency has not responded
to that request.
Meanwhile, the campaign continues on
voluntary corporate disclosure of carbon
emissions data. Earlier this week, the
Carbon Disclosure Project released its
fifth compilation of responses from a
survey of 500 of the world's largest
companies on their carbon emissions. More
than three-quarters of the companies now
respond to the survey, though not all
provide emissions data.
|
3. Shareholder activists mobilize to
oppose restrictions on resolutions
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Shareholder activist groups have been
building opposition to
proposals by the Securities and
Exchange Commission that could seriously
restrict their ability to submit proxy
resolutions. Among the possibilities that
the SEC suggested as part of a reform of
the advisory resolution process would be
giving boards the right to opt out of the
process, replacing resolutions with online
shareholder chat rooms and raising the
voting levels required for an unsuccessful
resolution to be resubmitted.
The Social Investment Forum and the
Interfaith Center on Corporate
Responsibility, with the support of CERES,
have created a
website called Save Shareholder Rights
that facilitates the submission of
comments to the SEC on the resolution
issue. The deadline for comments is next
Tuesday, October 2.
|
4. Another federal contracts database
unveiled
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
While the U.S. Office of Management and
Budget and the General Services
Administration are reviewing vendor bids
to create the database of federal
contracts and other spending mandated by
Congress in 2006, another non-governmental
entity has come forth with its own online
service. Following in the footsteps of OMB
Watch, which introduced its
FedSpending site about a year ago,
Global Computer Enterprises Inc. (GCE) has
created the
FFATA Information Center (the acronym
stands for the Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act, the
law passed by Congress to create an
official database).
GCE is the contractor that had been
hired by the General Services
Administration to upgrade the Federal
Procurement Data System, which for years
has been providing contract data in a less
than user-friendly way. The new FFATA
portal provides simple keyword searching
of a database that is said to include all
contracts since 1979. However, it does not
provide as many search features as
FedSpending.org, which recently
announced the inclusion of updated
data and the ability to search by
contractor characteristics such as being a
minority-owned business.
|
5. SEC seeks more details on executive
compensation
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Securities and Exchange Commission
recently sent letters to nearly 300
publicly traded companies critiquing the
disclosures they made on executive
compensation in their proxy statements
this year and asking for additional
information. The move was made without
prior announcement and without issuing a
press release. According to the Wall
Street Journal (August 31), the
letters were faxed directly to chief
executives, creating "much consternation"
in executive suites and prompting
emergency meetings of board compensation
committees. The letters came in the wake
of new rules adopted by the SEC last year
that were supposed to greatly improve the
quality of compensation disclosure.
|
6. PACER to provide federal court
transcripts
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The PACER database is taking another
step toward making federal court cases
completely accessible online. The Judicial
Conference of the United States, which
operates PACER, recently
announced that it has decided to make
transcripts of federal district and
bankruptcy court proceedings available
through the service. The plan is to make
the transcripts available for download 90
days after they are produced by court
reporters and delivered to the clerk's
office. Unfortunately, the
transcripts--like the dockets and filings
now available on PACER--will come at a
price: eight cents per page.
|
7. Report sees rise in corporate attention
to social responsibility
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ethical Investment Research Services,
a London-based non-profit, recently issued
a report concluding that corporations
around the world are paying more attention
than ever to issues of social
responsibility. The EIRIS study, titled
The State of Responsible Business,
sees the most progress among European
countries and finds that North American
corporations lag significantly behind.
Japanese companies, the report claims,
demonstrate strong performance on
environmental matters but not other social
issues.
|
8. Tracking down cell phone numbers
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It doesn't help the cause of privacy,
but researchers may be pleased to learn
that databases of cell phone numbers are
beginning to appear. The commercial
service Intelius recently launched a
database that provides access to cell
numbers (as well as unlisted landlines)
said to have been collected from public
records. There is no charge to search the
directory to see if someone is
included, but getting the actual number
costs $15. According to the
Seattle Times, an Intelius
executive claimed that the company has 120
million cell numbers, or about half of all
mobile accounts.
|
9. Finding online corporate information
you are not supposed to see
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Genie Tyburski, producer of a valuable
info service on legal research called
The Virtual Chase, recently published
a useful piece on how to find "private"
information on a company's (or other
organization's) website that is accessible
because of sloppy web posting practices.
Tyburski calls the
article "Searching Dirty to Find
What's Hidden."
|
10. WikiScanner exposes conflicts of
interest among Wikipedia editors
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Now that
Wikipedia has become one of the most
widely used online reference sources,
powerful corporations and institutions
have been paying more attention to how
they are depicted in the
democratically-edited site. Unfortunately,
many of them are not focusing on cleaning
up their act so their Wikipedia entry
improves accordingly. Instead, there has
been a spate of recent stories about
people working in these institutions who
have rewritten their employer's entry in a
more flattering way. These stories have
come to light thanks to a new search tool
called
WikiScanner that removes the cloak of
affiliational anonymity from Wikipedia
editors.
Created by California Institute of
Technology graduate student Virgil
Griffith, WikiScanner makes it possible to
trace the IP addresses of those who make
Wikipedia edits. At Griffith's site, one
can enter the name of a company or
organization and see what Wikipedia edits
have been made by anyone using a computer
linked to that institution. You can also
choose a Wikipedia entry and display the
IP addresses of those who have edited it.
|